<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seriously, who reads NME?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogephemera.wordpress.com/2008/12/22/seriously-who-reads-nme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogephemera.wordpress.com/2008/12/22/seriously-who-reads-nme/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 03:59:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pencil1902</title>
		<link>http://blogephemera.wordpress.com/2008/12/22/seriously-who-reads-nme/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>pencil1902</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogephemera.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>i wish i could use big words like that when i had no sleep!
i envy your brain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wish i could use big words like that when i had no sleep!<br />
i envy your brain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jen</title>
		<link>http://blogephemera.wordpress.com/2008/12/22/seriously-who-reads-nme/#comment-1114</link>
		<dc:creator>jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogephemera.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-1114</guid>
		<description>all I keep wondering is, does NME know how irrelevant they are?  They must right?  Or, are they living under a cloud of delusion.  I&#039;m fascinated despite myself.  They&#039;re like an ageing famewhore who can&#039;t deal with the fact they&#039;re not fresh and young anymore, and keep pumping more botox into their foreheads to mimic youthfulness.  It&#039;s downright strange and creepy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all I keep wondering is, does NME know how irrelevant they are?  They must right?  Or, are they living under a cloud of delusion.  I&#8217;m fascinated despite myself.  They&#8217;re like an ageing famewhore who can&#8217;t deal with the fact they&#8217;re not fresh and young anymore, and keep pumping more botox into their foreheads to mimic youthfulness.  It&#8217;s downright strange and creepy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayley</title>
		<link>http://blogephemera.wordpress.com/2008/12/22/seriously-who-reads-nme/#comment-1061</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogephemera.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-1061</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never heard of the terms &quot;rockism/rockist&quot; before. God, they look and sound like such clunky, made-up words. Clearly someone took umbrage at the term &quot;hipster&quot; (oh no, it&#039;s so ubiquitous now, don&#039;t want to be tagged as part of that vacantly ironic crowd, must find word that expresses my &lt;i&gt;even cooler&lt;/i&gt; status and place in the underground). 

In answer to your last question, no one reads NME anymore. Most of music culture realised long ago that NME is a completely irrelevant cultural dinosaur, erroneously still convinced that it is the sole source of musical wisdom when it was overtaken years ago by the internet. It&#039;s only the writers of NME (who write like a bunch of surly teenage boys, you are quite right) who still believe that their pronouncements are the ultimate in underground cred. Because really, considering the unholy power NME has inexplicably been able to wield across the industry and especially other critics if not punters themselves (especially focusing on their propensity for ruining young bands by hyping them to the heavens and then tearing them to shreds once they hit the mainstream wholly &lt;i&gt;due&lt;/i&gt; to goddamn freakin&#039; NME), the magazine ain&#039;t underground in the slightest anymore. It is the Establishment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never heard of the terms &#8220;rockism/rockist&#8221; before. God, they look and sound like such clunky, made-up words. Clearly someone took umbrage at the term &#8220;hipster&#8221; (oh no, it&#8217;s so ubiquitous now, don&#8217;t want to be tagged as part of that vacantly ironic crowd, must find word that expresses my <i>even cooler</i> status and place in the underground). </p>
<p>In answer to your last question, no one reads NME anymore. Most of music culture realised long ago that NME is a completely irrelevant cultural dinosaur, erroneously still convinced that it is the sole source of musical wisdom when it was overtaken years ago by the internet. It&#8217;s only the writers of NME (who write like a bunch of surly teenage boys, you are quite right) who still believe that their pronouncements are the ultimate in underground cred. Because really, considering the unholy power NME has inexplicably been able to wield across the industry and especially other critics if not punters themselves (especially focusing on their propensity for ruining young bands by hyping them to the heavens and then tearing them to shreds once they hit the mainstream wholly <i>due</i> to goddamn freakin&#8217; NME), the magazine ain&#8217;t underground in the slightest anymore. It is the Establishment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
